skip to content

International Development Research @ Cambridge


Oxford, UK and Grahamstown, South Africa - INASP ( and AJOL ( have launched a comprehensive framework for assessing the quality of the publishing processes of journals in the Global South. The tool helps researchers in the Global South differentiate between reputable journals and predatory publishers.

The Journal Publishing Practices and Standards (JPPS) framework ( provides detailed and internationally accepted assessment criteria for the quality of publishing practices and policies of Southern journals.

JPPS will inform and reassure authors and readers about reputable journals. More uniquely, it will also provide guidance to journal editors on how they should improve their publishing processes. Editors can resubmit their journals for reassessment six months to a year after the initial assessment if they can demonstrate improvement. INASP and AJOL also offer training and support to help journals improve their publishing processes.

Journals in the developing world face many challenges in being respected in the international research and publishing landscape. These concerns  can also limit the perceived credibility of the research published within those journals.

Sioux Cumming, Programme Manager for INASP’s Journals Online project, explained:

“For the many problems facing countries in the developing world to be properly addressed, it is vital that Southern researchers have the opportunity to publish their research and for it to be discoverable by other local - as well as global - researchers. Ensuring that high-quality Southern journals are trusted as part of local and global scholarship is essential for redressing scholarly imbalances and helping the Sustainable Development Goals to be realized.”

JPPS addresses the concerns that are often raised about the perceived quality of publication practices, policies and processes implemented by Southern journals. Journals assessed against the JPPS criteria are given one of six levels: inactive title; new title; no stars; one star; two stars; and three stars. The 108 criteria measure factors such as the amount of information included on a journals’ website; the transparency and robustness of the peer-review process; and the journal’s archiving policy.

The assigned JPPS levels serve a dual purpose. For readers and authors, they provide assurance that an assessed journal does meet an internationally recognized set of defined criteria at a particular level. For journal editors, the detailed feedback from the JPPS assessment helps them identify specifics ways to improve the quality of their journal  with a view to achieving a higher level at the next assessment.

Susan Murray, Executive Director of AJOL, said:

“We are very proud to be launching the JPPS framework, which builds on many years of work by AJOL and INASP in supporting the dissemination of Southern journals and understanding the various local contexts and challenges faced by these journals. This robust assessment framework is designed to demonstrate internationally accepted good practices in journal publishing and showcase partner journals on our platform that are already implementing these practices. It will also support our ongoing work of helping Southern journals to improve their processes.”

The process to inform editors in Africa, Asia and Latin America of their journals’ JPPS levels has already begun, with an overwhelmingly positive response.

Dr Chandre Gould, Senior Research Fellow, Governance Crime and Justice at the South African Institute for Security Studies, wrote to AJOL saying:

“The JPPS framework seems like a good system and offers us an important opportunity to improve the status of our journal. Thank you for the clear criteria.”

Dr Anuja Abyadeera, Editor of the Sri Lankan Journal of Anaesthesiology, commented:

“I am thrilled with the two-star status as it is, but I have stirred the editorial board that we have to achieve three-star status. I am determined to work towards it. Thank you so much for the constant support you have given me to work on the journal.”

Another Sri Lankan journal is also seeing the JPPS levels as a guide for improvements, as Dr C Arambepola and Dr Shamini Prathapan, the new co-editors of the Journal of the College of Community Physicians of Sri Lanka, highlighted:

“We have brought out a new facelift to the whole journal, and wish to improve on it too. We are targeting the ‘one star' of the standards by this year - as we wish to publish four issues per year. Hoping to go up to two stars by 2018 too and for it to be indexed very soon.”

To ensure a robust, independent process, journal assessments are being carried out on behalf of INASP and AJOL by a UK-based consultant with experience in international, and especially developing-country, publishing. The JPPS website and official JOL websites (see notes below) will be the only official sources of information about the JPPS levels that have been assigned to journals.


Please read more here.


Welcome to Cambridge Global Challenges

Cambridge Global Challenges is the Strategic Research Initiative (SRI) of the University of Cambridge that aims to enhance the contribution of its research towards addressing the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by 2030, with a particular focus on the poorest half of the world’s population.


Contribute to Cambridge's response to COVID-19 in developing countries

Join working groups that invite your collaboration, create a new working group and learn about available funding opportunities here.


Join the Strategic Research Initiative

Register to Cambridge Global Challenges and to the SRI's mailing list here.


Learn about the support we provide 

Information on how Cambridge Global Challenges can support your research is shared here.


Contact us

Research Strategy Manager (Dr Sara Serradas Duarte):​.